Tax and SARS knowledge base
How do I report unprofessional conduct by a tax practitioner to SARS?
How do I report unprofessional conduct by a tax practitioner to SARS?
Last reviewed:
Direct answer
SARS says a taxpayer or member of the public may report alleged unprofessional conduct by a tax practitioner to the practitioner's Recognised Controlling Body, to SARS, or to both. Use the RUC001 reporting process described in the SARS guide, provide a factual record, and separately deal with any outstanding returns, access controls or errors on your own tax account.
Treat the notice, account screen or correspondence for your own case as the operational starting point. SARS processes depend on tax type, period, service and the information on SARS's system. Keep every source record and avoid assuming that a general explanation confirms an outcome for your account.
What this means in practice
A report should be evidence-led and measured. SARS's guide covers registered tax practitioners, other professionals who provide tax assistance, and unregistered individuals practising as tax practitioners. It also explains that recognised controlling bodies have codes of conduct and disciplinary processes. A report is not proof of misconduct and it does not automatically correct your return, recover a loss or remove an authorised representative from your eFiling profile.
Protect your own tax compliance at the same time. If a practitioner has access to your eFiling profile, check your registered details, user rights, submitted returns, payment instructions and current compliance status. Save copies before changing access where possible. If an error in a return needs correction, take advice on the relevant SARS process rather than waiting for the conduct report to be resolved.
A useful way to manage a SARS matter is to create a dated evidence folder. Save the original message, list the tax reference and period, keep the return or assessment, and note every action you take. Save a PDF or screenshot of submissions. This record trail helps you distinguish a technical problem, a document request, a service complaint and a formal tax disagreement.
Step-by-step
- Secure your eFiling access. Change credentials where appropriate, check users and rights, and record the dates of any access changes.
- Assemble a factual chronology. Include engagement date, instructions given, documents supplied, actions taken, communications, invoices, return submissions and resulting concern.
- Identify the person or firm accurately. Record the name, contact details, practitioner registration or controlling body if known. Do not guess or publish allegations.
- Preserve original communications and documents. Screenshots should show dates and context; keep the original emails or letters too.
- Read SARS's RUC001 guide and select the appropriate reporting path. SARS says the report may be made to the relevant Recognised Controlling Body, SARS or both.
- Complete the form factually. Separate what you saw, what records show and what you believe needs investigation. Avoid conclusions that the documents cannot support.
- Retain submission proof and follow any response. Continue to correct your own tax affairs, including an outstanding return or incorrect registered representative, without assuming the report will do it for you.
Before submitting anything, reread the selected option and the reference number. Compare your proposed action with the original SARS communication, the latest Statement of Account and your supporting records. Keep the acknowledgement and check the account or case status afterwards. If the screen gives a validation failure or SARS asks for more information, deal with the identified issue rather than sending a duplicate request without checking the facts.
Documents and records to keep
- Engagement letter, mandate, invoices and proof of payments.
- Emails, messages, call records and copies of returns or submissions.
- eFiling user-rights records and current account documents.
- A dated chronology and RUC001 submission confirmation.
Keep a copy of the return, assessment, declaration or correspondence to which the matter relates. Store source records with meaningful file names and retain proof of submission. Do not alter a document to make it fit an expectation. If a record needs explanation, provide a brief factual schedule pointing to the relevant date, amount or return entry.
Important limits and exceptions
Do not make unverified allegations as established fact. A misconduct report is separate from civil recovery, criminal allegations, a SARS objection or correction of a tax return. SARS or a recognised controlling body determines its own process and outcome. Where conduct involves identity theft, unauthorised access or immediate financial risk, act to secure the profile and obtain appropriate advice promptly.
A general guide cannot choose the correct legal remedy where facts are disputed, a formal deadline is short, a material sum is involved, or another person has acted on your behalf. An upload, query, complaint or request may not replace an objection, appeal, payment arrangement, statutory disclosure or other tax-specific process. Use the current SARS notice to assess whether a separate step is required.
When to get tailored advice
Get tailored advice where returns may be incorrect, a deadline is approaching, the practitioner still controls access, a material loss is alleged, or the circumstances could involve fraud, identity misuse or a dispute with an insurer or professional body.
TaxProof can help organise a chronology, reconcile records and identify the questions requiring specialist review. It cannot make a SARS decision. Obtain prompt tax or legal advice for a final demand, audit request, estimated assessment, large balance, enforcement risk, confidentiality concern or formal deadline.