Tax and SARS knowledge base
Administrative vs understatement penalties: what differs?
What is the difference between an administrative penalty and an understatement penalty?
Last reviewed:
Direct answer
They are different penalty regimes. An administrative non-compliance penalty can relate to non-compliance such as a late return. An understatement penalty under section 222 of the Tax Administration Act concerns an understatement and is determined using the section 223 percentage table, unless a statutory exclusion applies, including where the understatement results from a bona fide inadvertent error.
The label on the SARS notice and the facts behind it matter. Do not assume a penalty can be removed simply because the company later submits a return or pays the underlying tax.
What this means in practice
Administrative penalties focus on a compliance obligation. SARS's August 2026 practitioner communication says SARS levies an administrative penalty under section 210 when a taxpayer does not submit a tax return on time. The required return, tax period, number of outstanding returns and notice history can be relevant. A business needs to identify precisely which return was due and whether SARS has correctly recorded its submission.
Understatement penalties focus on the tax effect of an understatement. SARS's Understatement Penalty Guide says section 222 applies in the event of an understatement and that the penalty is calculated by applying the highest applicable percentage under section 223 to each shortfall. The legal calculation can involve tax properly chargeable, a refund difference, an assessed loss or other benefit carried forward. It is not simply a flat late-filing charge.
The two regimes should be investigated separately even if they appear in the same assessment cycle. A company might have a filing issue, a substantive tax-position issue, interest, and a payment issue at the same time. Each may have different evidence, time limits and available remedies.
Step-by-step
- Identify the notice type.
Download the assessment, penalty notice, statement of account and any SARS letter. Record the tax product, year or period, penalty description, amount, issue date and due date. Check whether the notice calls the amount an administrative non-compliance penalty, an understatement penalty, interest, an additional assessment or something else.
- Reconcile the filing history.
For an administrative penalty, collect proof of return submission, eFiling history, correspondence and any explanation for an omission or delay. Check that SARS linked the return to the correct tax reference and period. If the return was filed late, identify the reason and the documents that support it.
- Reconcile the underlying tax position.
For an understatement penalty, isolate the return item that SARS says created the shortfall. Assemble invoices, agreements, payroll records, bank statements, calculations, working papers and the relevant legislation or SARS guidance. The analysis should identify the facts that support the original treatment and any facts that show it was wrong.
- Check the legal basis and facts before selecting a remedy.
A request for remission, a reduced-assessment request, an objection or an appeal are not interchangeable. The appropriate response depends on the notice, the provision, the taxpayer's evidence and the deadline. Do not send a general complaint where a tax dispute or a formal request is needed.
- Respond on time and retain proof.
File the permitted response before the relevant deadline. Save the eFiling confirmation, uploaded documents, correspondence and outcome. If the tax debt remains payable while the issue is considered, obtain advice about payment, possible suspension arrangements and interest exposure.
Documents and records to keep
Keep the original and corrected returns, notices of assessment, penalty letters, account statements, eFiling confirmations, correspondence, source records and tax computations. Maintain a chronology showing when the company received the notice, filed each return and submitted any remission or dispute request.
For a disputed understatement matter, retain the working papers that explain both the calculation and the factual basis. A reconstructed explanation without contemporaneous records may be difficult to support.
Important limits and exceptions
This article does not calculate a penalty or decide whether a bona fide inadvertent-error exclusion applies. Understatement penalties depend on the statutory definition, the shortfall, behaviour category and other provisions. The section 223 table must be checked in the current legal context, and a percentage should not be selected by analogy.
An administrative penalty is not necessarily the only consequence of an overdue return. Interest, collection activity or an additional assessment can be separate issues. Conversely, a tax correction does not automatically settle a penalty question.
When to get tailored advice
Get advice promptly if the company has received an understatement penalty, has more than one tax period affected, faces a large assessment, has an audit underway, or believes a SARS system or third-party error caused the position. Seek specialist advice before alleging that SARS has applied the wrong legal category.
TaxProof can help classify the documents and prepare a reconciliation. We cannot determine a penalty outcome without reviewing the complete notice, facts and current law.